"Nurse-The Archer" Fighting Against the Hidden Enemy.

Background and aim: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a global threat spreading like a wildfire and taking the world by its storm. It has challenged the healthcare delivery systems and disrupted them in a way no one ever imagined before. We at Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India received many patients in the COVID critical care unit (CCU) and found a gradual lack of bundle care compliance resulting in an upsurge of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) amid the patients. Materials and methods: A qualitative research approach and quasi-experimental research design were selected to assess the knowledge of the 150 frontline COVID CCU nurses regarding the CLABSI bundle and its prevention strategies. Results: This study revealed that 57% [mean (M) = 12.6; standard deviation (SD) = 2.37] of nurses had inadequate knowledge of the CLABSI bundle and its prevention strategies, in the pretest and scored 80% (M = 6.7; SD = 2.28) in the post-test, with "t" = 22.06 at p < 0.00001 after the hands-on training. The percentage of compliance to CLABSI bundle care increased to 83% and thereafter in an increasing trend. This was clearly evident through the reduction in the preventable CLABSI rate among critically ill COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: Nurses are on the frontline in preventing and controlling healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Fighting with all the visible and invisible challenges, our research focused on hands-on training for frontline warriors to adhere to the CLABSI bundle care which drove us to the reduction in preventable CLABSI rate in our hospital through improved CLABSI bundle compliance. How to cite this article: Premkumar S, Ramanathan Y, Varghese JJ, Morris B, Nambi PS, Ramakrishnan N, et al. "Nurse-The Archer" Fighting Against the Hidden Enemy. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(4):246-253.

Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare-associated infections, antibiotic resistance and consumption rates in intensive care units.

Purpose: This paper aimed to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), antibiotic resistance and consumption rates in intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care university hospital. Patients and Methods: Between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021, adult patients diagnosed with HAIs in ICUs were investigated retrospectively. Patients were divided into pre-pandemic (2018-2019) and pandemic periods (2020-2021). Antibiotic consumption index was calculated via using the formula of (total dose (grams)/defined daily dose (DDD) x total patient days) x1000. A p value below 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: The incidence of HAIs (per 1000 patient days) in the ICU of COVID-19 patients was 16.59, while it was 13.42 in the other ICUs during the pandemic period (p=0.107). The bloodstream infection (BSI) incidence was 3.32 in the pre-pandemic period and 5.41 in the pandemic period in ICUs other than the ICU of COVID-19 patients (p<0.001). In the pandemic period, the BSI incidence rate was significantly higher in the ICU of COVID-19 patients than in the other ICUs (14.26 vs 5.41, p<0.001). Central venous catheter bloodstream infections incidence rate was 4.72 in the pre-pandemic and 7.52 in the pandemic period in ICUs other than the ICU of COVID-19 patients (p=0.0019). During the pandemic period, the bacteraemia episode rates of Acinetobacter baumannii (5.375 vs 0.984, p<0.001), Enterococcus spp. (1.635 vs 0.268, p<0.001) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (3.038 vs 1.297, p=0.0086) in the ICU of COVID-19 patients were significantly found higher than others. The extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) positivity rates for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli were 61% and 42% in the pre-pandemic period; 73% and 69% in the pandemic period in ICUs other than the ICU of COVID-19 patients (p>0.05). In the pandemic period, the ESBL positivity rates for K. pneumoniae and E. coli were 83% and 100% in the ICU of COVID-19 patients, respectively. Meropenem (p<0.001), teicoplanin (p<0.001) and ceftriaxone (p<0.001) consumptions were increased while ciprofloxacin (p=0.003) consumption was decreased in all ICUs after the pre-pandemic period. Conclusions: BSI and CVCBSI incidence rates were significantly increased in all ICUs after the COVID-19 pandemic in our hospital. Bacteraemia episode rates of A. baumannii, Enterococcus spp. and S. maltophilia in ICU of COVID-19 patients were significantly found higher than others. In addition, meropenem, teicoplanin and ceftriaxone consumptions were increased in all ICUs after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study of cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria in patients with severe COVID-19

Pseudomonas aeruginosa can cause severe nosocomial infections and sepsis, especially in immunocompromised comorbid patients. The purpose of the study was to assess the frequency, clinical course, and the possibility of antimicrobial therapy for bloodstream infections caused by P. aeruginosa in patients with COVID-19. Material and methods. A retrospective single-center uncontrolled study was performed from October 1, 2020 to September 31, 2021 on the basis of a temporary infectious diseases hospital for patients with COVID-19 at the City Clinical Hospital No. 52, Moscow. During the analyzed period, 16 047 patients were admitted to the infectious diseases hospital. The study included 46 patients over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed by PCR RNA SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab (U 07.1) and/or computed tomography (CT) of the lungs (U 07.2). Statistical data processing was carried out using the BioStat, 2009 program (AnalystSoft, USA). Results and discussion. P. aeruginosa has been isolated from the blood of 0.29% of patients with COVID-19. In the structure of bacteremia, P. aeruginosa accounted for 6.1%. In 87% of cases, pathogens were isolated from the blood of patients in the ICU. Most strains are classified as XDR phenotypes - 74% and MDR - 21.7%. The sensitivity of hospital strains of P. aeruginosa was: to colistin - 97%, to amikacin - 39.1%, meropenem - 32.6%. All patients had concomitant diseases: cardiovascular (60%), oncological (27.5%), diabetes mellitus (20%), obesity (22.5%) and others. In 47.5% of cases (19/40), the cause of bloodstream infections was ventilator-associated pneumonia. The mortality rate among patients with COVID-19 with P. aeruginosa bacteremia is 80%. Conclusion. The wide distribution of multidrug-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa limits the number of therapeutic options. In severe bloodstream infections caused by P. aeruginosa XDR, combined antibiotic therapy regimens with the inclusion of polymyxin B are advisable.Copyright © 2022 Tomsk Polytechnic University, Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Distribution and drug resistance analysis of pathogenic bacteria in a hospital blood culture, 2018-2022

Objective: To analyze the distribution and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture specimens of patients with bloodstream infections before and after COVID-19 (2018-2019 and 2020-2021), and to provide scientific basis and reference for rational treatment and effective control of bloodstream infections in the post-epidemic period. Methods: Blood culture specimens were collected from patients in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University in the two years before and after the COVID-19 outbreak (2018-2021). The Automated Blood Culture Systems were used to perform blood culture on blood specimens sent for clinical inspection, and the Vitek MS automatic bacterial identification mass spectrometer was used for strain identification and the Vitek 2 automatic bacterial drug susceptibility analyzer was used for drug susceptibility testing and drug resistance analysis. Results: Blood culture specimens were performed on 28 736 patients with suspected bloodstream infection submitted for inspection from January 2018 to December 2019, and a total of 2 181 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected after removing duplicate strains, with a positive rate of 7.69%, including 1 046 strains of Gram-negative bacteria, accounting for 47.96%. From January 2020 to December 2021, blood culture specimens from 26 083 patients with suspected bloodstream infection were submitted for inspection, and a total of 2 111 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected after excluding duplicate strains, with a positive rate of 8.09%, including 1 000 strains of Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 47.37%. The drug resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae was relatively serious, and the sensitivity rate to ertapenem, polymyxin B and tigecycline was more than 90%. The main non-fermentative bacteria Acinetobacter baumannii was more than 50% sensitive to piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin and polymyxin B. The sensitivity rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, piperacillin and meropenem were more than 50%. Conclusions: In the two years before and after COVID-19, there are many types of pathogenic bacteria in bloodstream infection, but the distribution do not differ significantly. The pathogens of bloodstream infection are mainly distributed in ICU, hepatobiliary research institute, and nephrology department. Among them, Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii are the main ones, and different pathogens showed great differences in drug resistance.

Research progress of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 in septic acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common clinical syndrome in intensive care unit. Sepsis is a clinical syndrome, which is with life-threatening organ function damage caused by infection. As an important part of local microcirculation, the structure of alveolar-capillary membrane is easily damaged in the course of sepsis. So sepsis is the most prime and important inducing factor of ARDS, and it has higher mortality and fatality. As an important constitution of renin-angiotensin system (RAS), angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) has the function of protecting endothelium and regulating the expression of inflammatory factors, so it has received additional attention in recent years. Through the intervention of ACE-2, ARDS and the severity of COVID- 19 can be affected to a certain extent, so the role of ACE-2 in septic ARDS is worth discussing. This paper summarizes the biological characteristics and main mechanism of ACE-2, discusses the possible role of ACE-2 in septic ARDS, and finally explores the significance of ACE-2 in the evaluation and treatment of septic ARDS, in order to provide reference and inspiration for clinical treatment of sepsis-related ARDS.

Complications associated with the use of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters in COVID-19 patients: An observational prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Among the many interesting aspects of clinical care during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, vascular access still deserves some attention. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and midline catheters (MCs) are venous access devices inserted by ultrasound-guided puncture of veins of the arm, which have been associated with the possibility of minimizing infectious complications in different populations of patients. We have investigated their performance in SARS-CoV-2 patients. METHODS: As the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 is still unclear, we have designed a single-center, prospective observational study enrolling all patients with established diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted to our hospital in the period between October 2020 and April 2021 and who required either a PICC or a MC. RESULTS: We recruited 227 patients. The cumulative incidence of CRBSI was 4.35% (10 cases), that is, 3.5 episodes/1,000 catheter days. Four CRBSI occurred in patients with PICCs (4.5/1,000 catheter days) and 6 in those with MCs (3.2/1,000 catheter days). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that COVID-19 patients may have a more pronounced tendency for the development of catheter-related infections compared to other populations of patients.

Cefiderocol-Based versus Colistin-Based Regimens for Severe Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections: A Propensity Score-Weighted, Retrospective Cohort Study during the First Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: A large increase in multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, especially carbapenem-resistant strains, occurred during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, posing important challenges in its treatment. Cefiderocol appeared to be a good option for the treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-Ab), but to date, the guidelines and evidence available are conflicting. METHODS: We retrospectively included a group of patients with CR-Ab infections (treated with colistin- or cefiderocol-based regimens) at Padua University Hospital (August 2020-July 2022) and assessed predictors of 30-day mortality, and differences in microbiological and clinical treatment. To evaluate the difference in outcomes, accounting for the imbalance in antibiotic treatment allocation, a propensity score weighting (PSW) approach was adopted. RESULTS: We included 111 patients, 68% males, with a median age of 69 years (IQR: 59-78). The median duration of antibiotic treatment was 13 days (IQR:11-16). In total, 60 (54.1%) and 51 (45.9%) patients received cefiderocol- and colistin-based therapy, respectively. Notably, 53 (47.7%) patients had bloodstream infections, while 58 (52.3%) had pneumonia. Colistin was combined in 96.1%, 80.4%, and 5.8% of cases with tigecycline, meropenem, and fosfomycin, respectively. Cefiderocol was combined in 13.3%, 30%, and 18.3% of cases with fosfomycin, tigecycline, and meropenem, respectively. At the baseline, the two treatment groups significantly differed in age (patients treated with colistin were significantly older), the prevalence of diabetes and obesity (more frequent in the group treated with colistin), length of stay (longer in the group receiving cefiderocol), and type of infection (BSI were more frequent in the group receiving cefiderocol). The proportion of patients who developed acute kidney injury was significantly higher in the colistin group. By using PSW, no statistically significant differences emerged for mortality or clinical and microbiological cure between the two groups. No independent predictors were detected for hospital mortality or clinical cure, while for the length of stay, the only selected predictor was age, with a non-linear effect (p-value 0.025 for non-linearity) on the prolongation of hospital stay of 0.25 days (95% CI 0.10-0.39) at increasing ages (calculated over the IQR). CONCLUSIONS: Cefiderocol treatment did not differ in terms of main outcomes and safety profile from colistin-based regimens. More prospective studies with a larger number of patients are required to confirm our results.

Comparison of the healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units in Turkey before and during COVID-19.

Background: Secondary bacterial infections are an important cause of mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). All healthcare providers acted with utmost care with the reflex of protecting themselves during the COVID-19 period. We aimed to compare the rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and bloodstream infections (BSIs) in our intensive care units (ICUs) before and during the COVID-19 outbreak surges. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed in six centers in Turkey. We collected the patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, reasons for ICU admission, mortality and morbidity scores at ICU admission, and laboratory test data. Results: A total of 558 patients who required intensive care from six centers were included in the study. Four hundred twenty-two of these patients (males (62%), whose mean age was 70 [IQR, 58-79] years) were followed up in the COVID period, and 136 (males (57%), whose mean age was 73 [IQR, 61-82] years) were followed up in the pre-COVID period. BSI and VAP rates were 20.7 (19 events in 916 patient days) and 17 (74 events in 4361 patient days) with a -3.8 difference (P = 0.463), and 33.7 (31 events in 919 patient days) and 34.6 (93 events in 2685 patient days) with a 0.9 difference (P = 0.897), respectively. The mortality rates were 71 (52%) in pre-COVID and 291 (69%) in COVID periods. Conclusion: Protective measures that prioritize healthcare workers rather than patients and exceed standard measures made no difference in terms of reducing mortality.

"Nurse-The Archer" Fighting Against the Hidden Enemy.

Background and aim: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a global threat spreading like a wildfire and taking the world by its storm. It has challenged the healthcare delivery systems and disrupted them in a way no one ever imagined before. We at Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India received many patients in the COVID critical care unit (CCU) and found a gradual lack of bundle care compliance resulting in an upsurge of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) amid the patients. Materials and methods: A qualitative research approach and quasi-experimental research design were selected to assess the knowledge of the 150 frontline COVID CCU nurses regarding the CLABSI bundle and its prevention strategies. Results: This study revealed that 57% [mean (M) = 12.6; standard deviation (SD) = 2.37] of nurses had inadequate knowledge of the CLABSI bundle and its prevention strategies, in the pretest and scored 80% (M = 6.7; SD = 2.28) in the post-test, with "t" = 22.06 at p < 0.00001 after the hands-on training. The percentage of compliance to CLABSI bundle care increased to 83% and thereafter in an increasing trend. This was clearly evident through the reduction in the preventable CLABSI rate among critically ill COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: Nurses are on the frontline in preventing and controlling healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Fighting with all the visible and invisible challenges, our research focused on hands-on training for frontline warriors to adhere to the CLABSI bundle care which drove us to the reduction in preventable CLABSI rate in our hospital through improved CLABSI bundle compliance. How to cite this article: Premkumar S, Ramanathan Y, Varghese JJ, Morris B, Nambi PS, Ramakrishnan N, et al. "Nurse-The Archer" Fighting Against the Hidden Enemy. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(4):246-253.

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Candida auris, an emerging pathogen isolated from blood

Introduction: Candida auris has been reported from various health care settings and has recently gained importance because of its intrinsic resistance to many classes of antifungal agents and to disinfection. The outbreak potential and high mortality associated with Candida auris infection reinforces the need for speciation. Routine conventional methods are cumbersome and automated systems are unable to confirm up to species level. Materials and Methods: Candida auris isolates from consecutive non-repetitive blood cultures over a 1-year period were speciated based on phenotypic, physiological and biochemical tests and VITEK. Molecular confirmation was done by PCR-RFLP and MALDI-TOF. Anti- fungal susceptibility test was performed according to CLSI guidelines (2021), using suitable controls. Virulence factors such as production of Hemolysin, Phospholipase, Esterase and Bio-film production were demonstrated. RT-PCR was used to screen the COVID-19 status using SD-Biosensor kit. Baseline data and clinical history were collected and analysed. Results: Of 3632 blood cultures (0.77%), 28 Candida sp. were isolated including 9 Candida auris, (9/28, 32.14%). Of these 8 were from COVID-19 positive patients (88.89%), while 1 was from COVID-19 negative patient (11.11%). Two patients survived, while the remaining 7 patients succumbed to the disease. Conclusion: The increasing incidence of Candidiasis especially during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised the concern for early speciation. Through multi-modal strategies such as quick and correct identification, active surveillance, guided reporting, stringent infection control measures and correct use of anti-fungals through proper susceptibility testing, we can prevent the occurrence and spread of new Candida auris cases in the future.

SARS-CoV-2 versus flu: ECMO-associated bloodstream infections

SARS-CoV-2 and flu may lead to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The aim of the present study is to compare the incidence of bloodstream infections (BSIs) and outcome in patients with flu and SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalized in ICU and undergoing ECMO. This study is a retrospective analysis of the San Matteo COVID-19 Registry (SMACORE) cohort. The study was conducted from January 2018 to April 2020. Demographic data and microbiological data were recorded during hospitalization. BSIs occurring during ECMO were analyzed. Eighteen patients treated with ECMO, 22 subjects with SARS-CoV-2 infection and 7 with flu, median age 61 years for SARS-CoV-2 and 50 for flu (p=NS). Median ECMO duration was similar in the two pathologies. Median time to bloodstream infection from ECMO initiation was similar. Bloodstream infection incidence rate was 2.65 per 100 patients/days for flu and 2.2 per 100 patients/days for SARS-CoV-2. Global infection rate was 5 per 100 patients/days for SARS-CoV-2 patients and 5.3 per 100 patients/days for flu. Mortality during ECMO was 40.9% (5 out of 22 patients) for SARS-CoV-2 infection while none died among flu patients. ECMO-associated mortality was higher in SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with flu infection.

Microbiological profile and their antibiogram of bloodstream infections amongst first and second surge of the COVID-19 patients in a tertiary care hospital.

Introduction: The world is experiencing a pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2. The prescription of a superfluity of unnecessary antibiotics without regard for the potential for increased antimicrobial resistances is extensive and unimpeded during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aims: To compare the microorganisms and the pattern of antimicrobial resistance of bacteremia during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care hospital. Methods and Material: This retrospective observational study, to compared the blood culture of the COVID-19 pandemic during the first wave (April 2020 to September 2020) and the second wave (April 2021 to September 2021). All the blood culture isolates were identified and the antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done according to standard guidelines. Results: Out of 1470 blood culture samples, 259 (17.6%) blood bacterial isolates were grown in the first wave and, out of 4200 blood culture samples, 711 (16.9%) bacterial isolated during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CONS) was 32.8% followed by Staphylococcus aureus 29.7% in COVID first wave and staphylococcus aureus (48.9%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.6%) during COVID second wave were the most prevalent isolates. Conclusions: This study shows that coagulase-negative staphylococcus aureus and multidrug-resistant Klebsiella spp. are the leading causes of bloodstream coagulase-negative infections during both the first and second wave in the bloodstream COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparison of COVID-19 Severity and Mortality Rates in the First Four Epidemic Waves in Hungary in a Single-Center Study with Special Regard to Critically Ill Patients in an Intensive Care Unit.

Different variants of coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a virus responsible for severe acute respiratory syndrome, caused several epidemic surges in Hungary. The severity of these surges varied due to the different virulences of the variants. In a single-center, retrospective, observational study, we aimed to assess and compare morbidities and mortality rates across the epidemic waves I to IV with special regard to hospitalized, critically ill patients. A significant difference was found between the surges with regard to morbidity (p < 0.001) and ICU mortality (p = 0.002), while in-hospital mortality rates (p = 0.503) did not differ significantly. Patients under invasive ventilation had a higher incidence of bloodstream infection (aOR: 8.91 [4.43-17.95] p < 0.001), which significantly increased mortality (OR: 3.32 [2.01-5.48]; p < 0.001). Our results suggest that Waves III and IV, caused by the alpha (B.1.1.7) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants, respectively, were more severe in terms of morbidity. The incidence of bloodstream infection was high in critically ill patients. Our results suggest that clinicians should be aware of the risk of bloodstream infection in critically ill ICU patients, especially when invasive ventilation is used.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections in SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients: A Systematic Review.

Bacterial co-infections increase the severity of respiratory viral infections and are frequent causes of mortality in COVID-19 infected subjects. During the COVID-19 period, especially at the beginning of the pandemic, an inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antibiotic treatments has been frequently described, mainly due to prolonged hospitalization, especially in intensive care unit departments, and the use of immune-suppressive treatments as steroids. This misuse has finally led to the occurrence of infections by multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Although different reports assessed the prevalence of Gram-negative infections in COVID-19 infected patients, scarce data are currently available on bloodstream infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The aim of our systematic review is to describe data on this specific population and to discuss the possible implications that these co-infections could have in the management of COVID-19 pandemics in the future. We systematically analysed the current literature to find all the relevant articles that describe the occurrence of P. aeruginosa bloodstream infections in COVID-19 patients. We found 40 papers that described in detail P. aeruginosa HAIs-BSI in COVID-19 patients, including 756,067 patients overall. The occurrence of severe infections due to MDR bacteria had a significant impact in the management of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infections, leading to a prolonged time of hospitalization and to a consequent increase in mortality. In the near future, the increased burden of MDR bacteria due to the COVID-19 pandemic might partially be reduced by maintaining the preventive measures of infection control implemented during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, we discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic changed the role of antimicrobial stewardship in healthcare settings, according to the isolation of MDR bacteria and how to restore on a large scale the optimization of antibiotic strategies in COVID-19 patients.

Gram-negative ESKAPE bacteria bloodstream infections in patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bloodstream infections due to bacteria are a highly consequential nosocomial occurrences and the organisms responsible for them are usually multidrug-resistant. The aims of this study were to describe the incidence of bacteremia caused by Gram-negative ESKAPE bacilli during the COVID-19 pandemic and characterize the clinical and microbiological findings including antimicrobial resistance. A total of 115 Gram-negative ESKAPE isolates were collected from patients with nosocomial bacteremia (18% of the total bacteremias) in a tertiary care center in Mexico City from February 2020 to January 2021. These isolates were more frequently derived from the Respiratory Diseases Ward (27), followed by the Neurosurgery (12), Intensive Care Unit (11), Internal Medicine (11), and Infectious Diseases Unit (7). The most frequently isolated bacteria were Acinetobacter baumannii (34%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (28%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23%) and Enterobacter spp (16%). A. baumannii showed the highest levels of multidrug-resistance (100%), followed by K. pneumoniae (87%), Enterobacter spp (34%) and P. aeruginosa (20%). The bla CTX-M-15 and bla TEM-1 genes were identified in all beta-lactam-resistant K. pneumoniae (27), while bla TEM-1 was found in 84.6% (33/39) of A. baumannii isolates. The carbapenemase gene bla OXA-398 was predominant among carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (74%, 29/39) and bla OXA-24was detected in four isolates. One P. aeruginosa isolate was bla VIM-2 gene carrier, while two K. pneumoniae and one Enterobacter spp were bla NDM gene carriers. Among colistin-resistant isolates mcr-1 gene was not detected. Clonal diversity was observed in K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp. Two outbreaks caused by A. baumannii ST208 and ST369 were detected, both belonging to the clonal complex CC92 and IC2. A. baumannii was associated with a death rate of 72% (28/32), most of them (86%, 24/28) extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant isolates, mainly in patients with COVID-19 (86%, 24/28) in the Respiratory Diseases Ward. A. baumannii isolates had a higher mortality rate (72%), which was higher in patients with COVID-19. There was no statistically significant association between the multidrug-resistant profile in Gram-negative ESKAPE bacilli and COVID-19 disease. The results point to the important role of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative ESKAPE bacteria causing bacteremia in nosocomial settings before and during the COVID-19 epidemic. Additionally, we were unable to identify a local impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial resistance rates, at least in the short term.

Device Nurses Can Prevent CLABSIs

The article talks about how the hiring by UConn Health in Fairfeld, Connecticut of two epidemiology nurses has helped in preventing central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Topics covered include the daily device rounds performed by the nurses, the critical oversight and infection prevention that they provide, and the easy-to-use antiseptic swab with a shorter scrub and dry time for catheter insertion implemented by the hospital.

Low incidence of severe bacterial infections in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: A population-based registry study.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial infections complicating COVID-19 are rare but present a challenging clinical entity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, aetiology and outcome of severe laboratory-verified bacterial infections in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. METHODS: All laboratory-confirmed patients with COVID-19 admitted to specialised healthcare hospitals in the Capital Province of Finland during the first wave of COVID-19 between 27 February and 21 June 2020 were retrospectively studied. We gathered the blood and respiratory tract culture reports of these patients and analysed their association with 90-day case-fatality using multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: A severe bacterial infection was diagnosed in 40/585 (6.8%) patients with COVID-19. The range of bacteria was diverse, and the most common bacterial findings in respiratory samples were gram-negative, and in blood cultures gram-positive bacteria. Patients with severe bacterial infection had longer hospital stay (mean 31; SD 20 days) compared to patients without (mean 9; SD 9 days; p < 0.001). Case-fatality was higher with bacterial infection (15% vs 11%), but the difference was not statistically significant (OR 1.38 CI95% 0.56-3.41). CONCLUSIONS: Severe bacterial infection complicating COVID-19 was a rare occurrence in our cohort. Our results are in line with the current understanding that antibiotic treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients should only be reserved for situations where a bacterial infection is strongly suspected. The ever-evolving landscape of the pandemic and recent advances in immunomodulatory treatment of COVID-19 patients underline the need for continuous vigilance concerning the possibility and frequency of nosocomial bacterial infections.

Bacterial superinfections in critically ill COVID-19 patients – experiences from University Hospital Dubrava tertiary COVID-19 center

Goal:To determine incidence of bacterial superinfections, causative pathogens demographic data, relevant laboratory parameters and outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated in primary respiratory intensivist center (PRIC) UH Dubrava. Patients and methods: In this retrospective observational study, clinical and laboratory data of 692 critically ill patients treated in PRIC UH Dubrava between March 1st 2020. and February 1st 2021. was collected using the hospital information system software (BIS) and statistical analysis was performed using the jamovi statistical package. Results: Out of 692 patients admitted to the ICU, 383 acquired bacterial or fungal superinfections. 305 acquired pneumonia, 133 bloodstream infections and 120 urinary infections. 66.3% of patients were males, and bacterial superinfections were more common in patients admitted from hospital wards or external ICUs. Out of 305 patients with pneumonia, 295 were receiving mechanical ventilation and satisfied the criteria for ventilator associated pneumonia. Patients with bloodstream infections maintained elevated neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, lymphopenia and elevated CRP levels on day 7 compared to those without BSI. Urinary infections were more common in females, and did not have an effect on outcomes. All patients that developed superinfections had prolonged ICU and hospital stay. Conclusion: Incidence of bacterial superinfections in critically ill COVID-19 patients is 55.3%. Most common infections are ventilator associated pneumonia, bloodstream infections and urinary infections. Most common pathogens are multi-drug resistant pathogens. Patients with bacterial superinfections have longer ICU and hospital stay, and in these patients, persistent elevation of NLR ratio and worsening of lymphopenia are characteristic for patients with worse outcomes © 2022 Hrvatski Lijecnicki Zbor. All rights reserved.

Study of cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria in patients with severe COVID-19

Pseudomonas aeruginosa can cause severe nosocomial infections and sepsis, especially in immunocompromised comorbid patients. The purpose of the study was to assess the frequency, clinical course, and the possibility of antimicrobial therapy for bloodstream infections caused by P. aeruginosa in patients with COVID-19. Material and methods. A retrospective single-center uncontrolled study was performed from October 1, 2020 to September 31, 2021 on the basis of a temporary infectious diseases hospital for patients with COVID-19 at the City Clinical Hospital No. 52, Moscow. During the analyzed period, 16 047 patients were admitted to the infectious diseases hospital. The study included 46 patients over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed by PCR RNA SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab (U 07.1) and/or computed tomography (CT) of the lungs (U 07.2). Statistical data processing was carried out using the BioStat, 2009 program (AnalystSoft, USA). Results and discussion. P. aeruginosa has been isolated from the blood of 0.29% of patients with COVID-19. In the structure of bacteremia, P. aeruginosa accounted for 6.1%. In 87% of cases, pathogens were isolated from the blood of patients in the ICU. Most strains are classified as XDR phenotypes – 74% and MDR – 21.7%. The sensitivity of hospital strains of P. aeruginosa was: to colistin – 97%, to amikacin – 39.1%, meropenem – 32.6%. All patients had concomitant diseases: cardiovascular (60%), oncological (27.5%), diabetes mellitus (20%), obesity (22.5%) and others. In 47.5% of cases (19/40), the cause of bloodstream infections was ventilator-associated pneumonia. The mortality rate among patients with COVID-19 with P. aeruginosa bacteremia is 80%. Conclusion. The wide distribution of multidrug-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa limits the number of therapeutic options. In severe bloodstream infections caused by P. aeruginosa XDR, combined antibiotic therapy regimens with the inclusion of polymyxin B are advisable. © 2022 Tomsk Polytechnic University, Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in patients deceased with COVID-19 in Italy (2020-2021).

Introduction: In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with high mortality and high antibiotic resistance rates. The aim of this study was to describe BSI etiology, antimicrobial resistance profile and risk factors in a sample of patients deceased with COVID-19 from the Italian National COVID-19 surveillance. Methods: Hospital charts of patients who developed BSI during hospitalization were reviewed to describe the causative microorganisms and their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. Risk factors were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The study included 73 patients (71.2% male, median age 70): 40 of them (54.8%) received antibiotics and 30 (41.1%) systemic steroids within 48 h after admission; 53 (72.6%) were admitted to intensive care unit. Early steroid use was associated with a significantly shorter interval between admission and BSI occurrence. Among 107 isolated microorganisms, the most frequent were Enterococcus spp., Candida spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Median time from admission to BSI was shorter for Staphylococcus aureus compared to all other bacteria (8 vs. 24 days, p = 0.003), and longer for Enterococcus spp., compared to all other bacteria (26 vs. 18 days, p = 0.009). Susceptibility tests showed a high rate of resistance, with 37.6% of the bacterial isolates resistant to key antibiotics. Resistance was associated with geographical area [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for Central/South Italy compared to North Italy: 6.775, p = 0.002], and with early use of systemic steroids (AOR 6.971, p = 0.018). Conclusions: In patients deceased with COVID-19, a large proportion of BSI are caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Early steroid use may facilitate this occurrence.